After some volatile sessions, the S&P500 ($SPX) ended the week down 0.3%. The index is above key moving averages, but remains rangebound between 4200 and 4050. It hasn't been able to distance itself from the prior trendline of lower-highs either.
2023-05-14-SPX Trendline Analysis - Daily
Price/volume remains mixed; still in search of a breakout to the upside. Institutional selling continued during the first week of May, and then receded last week. Since mid-March, most high volume trading days have been to the downside. So-called leading stocks, as measured by the $FFTY, haven’t made any progress since February.
Elliott Wave remains mixed and messy. Resistance at 4196 held, but so did support at 4050. Taking at look at the longer-term counts, another adjustment is needed and therefore a redo of the short-term counts.
The March update addressed the longer than expected corrective waves (3-wave "flat" pattern). Now that we have more price action to work with, the extended time frame makes sense if the pattern is a "triangle", rather than a "flat".
A triangle occurs during sideways price movements, and accompanied by decreasing volume and volatility (sound familiar?). Triangles have 5 waves, with each one subdivided into 3 parts (i.e. a 3-3-3-3-3 structure).
Example Elliott Wave Pattern - Ascending Triangle
In this case, an ascending triangle, based on the index meeting resistance near 4200, along with a series of higher lows (flat top, rising bottom). The key question for a bullish versus bearish count is when did the pattern begin; at the November high, or at the October low?
No post last week due to some last minute travel; life happens and sometimes there aren't enough hours in the day. That said, not much has changed, with the market seemingly waiting for the next shoe to drop before deciding on a direction.
Lets recap some economic data with help from Hedgeye Risk Management:
In summary, overall economic activity is essentially flat, and unemployment relatively low. Inflation continues to slow, but remains high versus targets. We have an earnings recession, even though companies are "beating" lowered analyst estimates. And the Fed's higher for longer policy remains in place. So the economic situation is tenuous, at best.
Unfortunately, the U.S. now faces the debt ceiling debacle. A couple of months back, I mentioned the topic wasn't worth discussing until we were closer to the deadline. Well, it's closer, since the amount of money generated by our taxes wasn't as high as the U.S. Treasury expected. Now the deadline is early June.
The recess/travel schedules of the legislative and executive branches of government leaves ~15 working days to solve the problem. And by solve the problem, I mean reach an agreement, form the necessary committees, reach consensus on specifics, submit those specifics to Congress for ratification, then get the ratified legislation to the President for approval. Did I mention the 15 day timeframe?
You'd be forgiven for yawning after reading that paragraph. After all, doesn't this brinksmanship always lead up to the powers that be pulling out an 11th hour solution? While that's true, what caught my attention was the pricing of U.S. CDS; specifically the rate of change.
Credit default swaps (not to be confused with Certificates of Deposit) are used by investors to hedge or "insure" exposure to government debt, such as countries with large holdings in U.S. Treasuries like China or Japan. PIMCO has an excellent primer on credit default swaps if you want more detailed info).
In the past, warnings were typically limited to countries that have defaulted in the past or struggled with currency issues like Brazil, Mexico, Greece, Italy, and Russia.
Last week, the spreads on 1-year U.S. CDS reached 172 basis points, which is an all-time high and up from 10 basis points 1 year ago(!).
Source: Hedgeye Risk Management
The spread on the 5-year CDS hit 73 basis points; the highest level since 2009. Now that doesn't mean default is a given. In fact, the 173 basis points for the 1-year CDS implies that the overall probability of default is ~4% (Source: MSCI). But when rate of change data shows market participants are starting to hedge, it's time to pay attention.
The concern for most investors is their money market funds, which are largely invested in U.S. treasuries. If an agreement isn't reached, then the government will need to prioritize which bills get paid, and that includes interest on U.S. Treasuries. Seniors relying on social security payments also need to ensure they have additional funds in their checking accounts, just in case their payments are delayed/interrupted.
Happy Mother's Day!
P.S. If you find this research helpful, please tell a friend.
If you don't, tell an enemy.
Sources: Bloomberg, CNBC, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Hedgeye, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
How to Make Money in Stocks: A Winning System in Good Times and Bad.
It's one of my favorites.
Charts provided courtesy of stockcharts.com.
For historical Elliott Wave commentary and analysis, go to ELLIOTT WAVE lives on by Tony Caldaro. Current counts can be found at: Pretzel Logic, and 12345ABCDEWXYZ
Once a year, I review the market outlook signals as if they were a mechanical trading system, while pointing out issues and making adjustments. The goal is to give you to give you an example of how to analyze and continuously improve your own systems.
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION
This material is for general communication and is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only. None of the content should be viewed as a suggestion that you take or refrain from taking any action nor as a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, or other such purpose. Certain information contained herein has been obtained from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but we cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisors of his/her choosing. Invest Safely, LLC is not a law firm, certified public accounting firm, or registered investment advisor and no portion of its content should be construed as legal, accounting, or investment advice.
The material is not to be construed as an offer or a recommendation to buy or sell a security nor is it to be construed as investment advice. Additionally, the material accessible through this website does not constitute a representation that the investments described herein are suitable or appropriate for any person.
Any referenced performance is “as calculated” using the referenced funds and has not been independently verified. This presentation does not discuss, directly or indirectly, the amount of the profits or losses, realized or unrealized, by any reader or contributor, from any specific funds or securities.
The author and/or any reader may have experienced materially different performance based upon various factors during the corresponding time periods. To the extent that any portion of the content reflects hypothetical results that were achieved by means of the retroactive application of a back-tested model, such results have inherent limitations, including:
Model results do not reflect the results of actual trading using assets, but were achieved by means of the retroactive application of the referenced models, certain aspects of which may have been designed with the benefit of hindsight
Back-tested performance may not reflect the impact that any material market or economic factors might have had on the use of a trading model if the model had been used during the period to actually manage assets
Actual investment results during the corresponding time periods may have been materially different from those portrayed in the model
Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no one should assume that future performance will be profitable, or equal to any corresponding historical index.
The S&P 500 Composite Total Return Index (the "S&P") is a market capitalization-weighted index of 500 widely held stocks often used as a proxy for the stock market. Standard & Poor's chooses the member companies for the S&P based on market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. Included are the common stocks of industrial, financial, utility, and transportation companies. The S&P is not an index into which an investor can directly invest. The historical S&P performance results (and those of all other indices) are provided exclusively for comparison purposes only, so as to provide general comparative information to assist an individual in determining whether the performance of a specific portfolio or model meets, or continues to meet investment objective(s). The model and indices performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes.
Investing involves risk (even the “safe” kind)! Past performance does not guarantee or indicate future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of underlying risk. Therefore, do not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), or prove successful (including the investments and/or investment strategies describe on this site).