1. Invest-Safely.com
  2. >>
  3. Tracking the Stock Market
  4. >>
  5. Stock Market Outlook - 2021-01-31

Stock Market Outlook
For The Week Of January 31st = Uptrend


    ADX Directional Indicators: Downtrend
    Price & Volume Action: Mixed
    Elliott Wave Analysis: Uptrend


The stock market outlook still shows an uptrend, but there's bearish price action across the board.

Technical analysis of daily SPX prices

2021-01-31-SPX Trendline Analysis - Daily

The S&P500 ($SPX) price channel broke down last week, and price now rests right on the 50-day moving average. Breaking that level next week would shift the signal AND the overall market outlook, so stay frosty. And price is ~10% above the 200-day, which is still on the high side, historically.

The ADX directional indicators crossed over Wednesday, but the trend is still weak. Two distribution days were added to the count, but the price/volume signal hasn't flipped just yet.

Technical analysis of daily SPX prices

2021-01-31-SPX Elliott Wave Analysis - Daily - Primary 1

Elliott Wave shows a near term downtrend in place i.e. 4th wave), There was a slight divergence in the RSI at Friday’s low (a positive sign), but the 38% retracement level of the most recent wave is near 3,620, suggesting further downside next week.

The limit for the 4th wave would be the high of the first wave (3,550). Anything further south and the longer-term count needs adjustment. That would also be the point where the signal would flip.


So...anything interesting happen in the markets this week?

I feel like I've had an entire year's worth of market-related discussions in the past 5 days. Unless you've been under a rock, you've heard something about:

  • Retail traders using online message boards (i.e. Reddit & r/Wallstreetbets) to discuss stocks that were being "shorted" by hedge funds (e.g. Gamestop).
  • Those retail traders bought large amounts of stock and/or options, driving the stock price higher.
  • This forced hedge funds to cover their short positions (e.g. buy more stock and/or options) creating a feedback loop of higher prices (e.g. short/gamma squeezes).

But investors who've been around awhile have heard this all before; similar games were played back in 2000:

  • Traders used online message boards (i.e. Yahoo message boards) to highlight stocks that were extremely cheap and had very low trading volumes (OTC and "Penny Stocks").
  • Those traders had already accumulated large positions. Uninformed investors then bought massive amounts of stock, driving the stock price higher.
  • Those with initial positions would sell into the rally, and then prices would return to their original levels (i.e. pump and dump schemes).

What's new this time around? The scale of the activity, thanks in part to:

  • A pervasive "versus" mentality
    • Haves vs Have Nots, Protected vs Unprotected, Institutional vs. Retail, Wall St. vs Main St.
  • The K-shaped economic recovery (Essential vs Non-essential Businesses)
  • Access to leverage (i.e. options, margin, low interest rate debt)
  • Access to financial data and information
  • Access and usage of social media

Whether or not Gamestop ($GME) should be priced at $1,000, $500, or $0.50 isn't the point; it's worth whatever people will pay for it, and that price will change over time.

Price change from trading isn't limited to trading Gamestop. Similar price action occurred last summer in shares of Kodak ($KODK), or during 2018 in shares of Tilray ($TLRY). Lets not forget the prior or current run in Bitcoin. It could be in gold or silver some day as inflation worries pick up.

Many traders and investors will see profits. Many traders and investors will see losses; that's the nature of speculation. The size of those changes are all relative to their personal financial situation; your small losses may be huge for me or visa versa.

Of more concern is the potential for a broad shift in asset allocation towards de-risking portfolios. We know that the market is overvalued by almost every measure (see last week's post). These moves take longer to play out (think a cruise liner turning around), and we're just along for the ride. Billion dollar losses by hedge funds and market makers tend to cause changes.

Several market commentators have noted that many stocks are besting analyst estimates, then selling off (or at least not rallying). That's not the behavior of strong bull markets, and suggests this news is already reflected at current price levels.

Coincidentally, some investors I greatly respect say that the market top is in and we're going to see a major correction. We'll only know if they're right in hindsight, and even they acknowledge that they're probably early. But the fact that they've coming out publicly and saying that it's time to cash out is worth noting.

The stock market has had a good run since November, so don't be shy about taking some money off the table (e.g. recover your initial investment). Keep your losses small no matter what. You can always buy back in if/when price action improves.

Best to Your Week!

If you find this research helpful, please tell a friend. If you don't find it helpful, tell an enemy.

I regularly share articles and other news of interest via on Twitter (@investsafely), Facebook, Linkedin, and Instagram (@investsafely)

If you're interested in learning more about the relationship between price and volume, or how to find and trade the best stocks for your growth strategy, check out this book on Amazon via the following affiliate link:

How to Make Money in Stocks: A Winning System in Good Times and Bad.

It's one of my favorites.

Charts provided courtesy of stockcharts.com.

For the detailed Elliott Wave Analysis, go to the ELLIOTT WAVE lives on by Tony Caldaro.

Once a year, I review the market outlook signals as if they were a mechanical trading system, while pointing out issues and making adjustments. The goal is to give you to give you an example of how to analyze and continuously improve your own systems.

This material is for general communication and is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only. None of the content should be viewed as a suggestion that you take or refrain from taking any action nor as a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, or other such purpose. Certain information contained herein has been obtained from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but we cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisors of his/her choosing. Invest Safely, LLC is not a law firm, certified public accounting firm, or registered investment advisor and no portion of its content should be construed as legal, accounting, or investment advice.
The material is not to be construed as an offer or a recommendation to buy or sell a security nor is it to be construed as investment advice. Additionally, the material accessible through this website does not constitute a representation that the investments described herein are suitable or appropriate for any person.
Hypothetical Presentations:
Any referenced performance is “as calculated” using the referenced funds and has not been independently verified. This presentation does not discuss, directly or indirectly, the amount of the profits or losses, realized or unrealized, by any reader or contributor, from any specific funds or securities.
The author and/or any reader may have experienced materially different performance based upon various factors during the corresponding time periods. To the extent that any portion of the content reflects hypothetical results that were achieved by means of the retroactive application of a back-tested model, such results have inherent limitations, including:
Model results do not reflect the results of actual trading using assets, but were achieved by means of the retroactive application of the referenced models, certain aspects of which may have been designed with the benefit of hindsight
Back-tested performance may not reflect the impact that any material market or economic factors might have had on the use of a trading model if the model had been used during the period to actually manage assets
Actual investment results during the corresponding time periods may have been materially different from those portrayed in the model
Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no one should assume that future performance will be profitable, or equal to any corresponding historical index.
The S&P 500 Composite Total Return Index (the "S&P") is a market capitalization-weighted index of 500 widely held stocks often used as a proxy for the stock market. Standard & Poor's chooses the member companies for the S&P based on market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. Included are the common stocks of industrial, financial, utility, and transportation companies. The S&P is not an index into which an investor can directly invest. The historical S&P performance results (and those of all other indices) are provided exclusively for comparison purposes only, so as to provide general comparative information to assist an individual in determining whether the performance of a specific portfolio or model meets, or continues to meet investment objective(s). The model and indices performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes.

Investing involves risk (even the “safe” kind)! Past performance does not guarantee or indicate future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of underlying risk. Therefore, do not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), or prove successful (including the investments and/or investment strategies describe on this site).