Weekend Stock Market Outlook
Stock Market Outlook For The Week of
August 25th = Downtrend
ADX Directional Indicators: Downtrend
Price & Volume Action: Downtrend
Objective Elliott Wave Analysis: Downtrend
Anything interesting impact the markets last week? Anyone? Anyone?
In summary, the game of one-upmanship continued. The Chinese government decided to increase tariffs on U.S. goods, in retaliation for the increase of U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods. The U.S. retaliated by raising the existing tariffs on Chinese goods even higher. More tweets to come, I'm sure.
No change in the market outlook; the downtrend continues. The ADX, price/volume, and OEW indicators are all bearish.
2019-08-25 - SPX Trendline Analysis - Daily
The S&P500 ($SPX
) continues to trade below its 50-day moving average. The trendline for the downtrend flattened a bit, now crossing through Thursdays close. The floor of support near 2,825 remains intact. The next stop would be ~2,725.
2019-08-25- SPX Trendline Analysis - Weekly
The weekly view shows a fairly steep downtrend, similar to May's decline. This time around, we've had "higher" lows each week. Year-to-date (3rd week in August), the S&P has basically gone nowhere; the index netted a loss of 0.9%. Prices rose as much as 5%, and fell as much as 18%, which reflects the volatility we've experienced over the past 12 months.
The U.S. Fed meeting in Jackson Hole, which was supposed to provide the fireworks last week, became a sidenote thanks to the tariff talk. Fed chief Powell commented on the tariffs, more evidence of a global slowdown, and troubling economic "fundamentals" like low inflation. He also mentioned that the Fed is looking into the "monetary policy tools we have used both in calm times and in crisis, and we are asking whether we should expand our toolkit." Some people feel this is a reference to Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), or more accurately known as the Magic Money Tree.
- As an issuer of currency, a government cannot go bankrupt because it can just keep creating and printing money
- Governments can spend without restraint
- Large deficits and debt don’t matter when an economy is not at full capacity
- Assumes that public programs are created to stimulate economic activity
- All public programs can be financed by debt or creating money
- Politicians have latched on to this one with an iron fist!
- Financial and political activities are coordinated
- Taxes can be used to control inflation
- Assumes that a government can actually do this correctly
- Assumes that the public will act rationally to higher taxes
Sadly, whether or not the theory is true or can even be successful in a democratic country is irrelevant. When we have another recession, cutting interest rates will not be enough, and the government will be called upon to do something (anything). Politicians will look at the potential benefits and say the ends justify the means.
I, for one, am hopeful that cooler heads prevail and we don't see anything like MMT. But I'm also getting prepared, in case we do.
If you find this research helpful, please tell a friend. If you don't find it helpful, tell an enemy. I share articles and other news of interest via Twitter; you can follow me @investsafely
. The weekly market outlook is also posted on Facebook
Charts provided courtesy of stockcharts.com.
If you're interested in learning more about the relationship between price and volume, or how to find and trade the best stocks for your growth strategy, check out this book on Amazon via the following affiliate link: How to Make Money in Stocks: A Winning System in Good Times and Bad. It's one of my favorites.
For the detailed Elliott Wave Analysis, go to the ELLIOTT WAVE lives on by Tony Caldaro.
Once a year, I review the market outlook signals as if they were a mechanical trading system, while pointing out issues and making adjustments. The goal is to give you to give you an example of how to analyze and continuously improve your own systems.
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION
This material is for general communication and is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only. None of the content should be viewed as a suggestion that you take or refrain from taking any action nor as a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, or other such purpose. Certain information contained herein has been obtained from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but we cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisors of his/her choosing. Invest Safely, LLC is not a law firm, certified public accounting firm, or registered investment advisor and no portion of its content should be construed as legal, accounting, or investment advice.
The material is not to be construed as an offer or a recommendation to buy or sell a security nor is it to be construed as investment advice. Additionally, the material accessible through this website does not constitute a representation that the investments described herein are suitable or appropriate for any person.
Any referenced performance is “as calculated” using the referenced funds and has not been independently verified. This presentation does not discuss, directly or indirectly, the amount of the profits or losses, realized or unrealized, by any reader or contributor, from any specific funds or securities.
The author and/or any reader may have experienced materially different performance based upon various factors during the corresponding time periods. To the extent that any portion of the content reflects hypothetical results that were achieved by means of the retroactive application of a back-tested model, such results have inherent limitations, including:
Model results do not reflect the results of actual trading using assets, but were achieved by means of the retroactive application of the referenced models, certain aspects of which may have been designed with the benefit of hindsight
Back-tested performance may not reflect the impact that any material market or economic factors might have had on the use of a trading model if the model had been used during the period to actually manage assets
Actual investment results during the corresponding time periods may have been materially different from those portrayed in the model
Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no one should assume that future performance will be profitable, or equal to any corresponding historical index.
The S&P 500 Composite Total Return Index (the "S&P") is a market capitalization-weighted index of 500 widely held stocks often used as a proxy for the stock market. Standard & Poor's chooses the member companies for the S&P based on market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. Included are the common stocks of industrial, financial, utility, and transportation companies. The S&P is not an index into which an investor can directly invest. The historical S&P performance results (and those of all other indices) are provided exclusively for comparison purposes only, so as to provide general comparative information to assist an individual in determining whether the performance of a specific portfolio or model meets, or continues to meet investment objective(s). The model and indices performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes.
Investing involves risk (even the “safe” kind)! Past performance does not guarantee or indicate future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of underlying risk. Therefore, do not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), or prove successful (including the investments and/or investment strategies describe on this site).